Bill simmons 10 simple rules to dating the sports guy
Fox Sports 1 has been on the air for more than a year, and it won't be until the baseball playoffs begin (FS1 is showing the NLCS and one of the NLDS) that most people will even know where it is on their dial. Simmons must feel bulletproof by now, but he isn't. People want to watch sports and move along with their day. I'm just bummed that it came now when he would be gearing up for the NBA season.
I love Simmons but his summer shit just gets old after a while, he needs to talk about the NBA.
That and 30 for 30 are both money sinks that ESPN keeps up for its professional image or integrity, but they don't directly generate a profit.
That and 30 for 30 are both money sinks that ESPN keeps up for its professional image or integrity, but they don't directly generate a profit. And I recently paid 60 bucks for a year subscription to Anthony Cumia's site for his podcasts, something I probably won't renew. If Grantland were to splinter off and make itself a pay site, and if they were continueing to produce 30 for 30 work that you could only get from there, I'd probably be willing to pay for a subscription, and I'm not sure how much.
If the majority of Americans are happy with how the economy is going (or think the person who best represents the status quo will best address the economy going forward), they will keep the incumbent in charge. Everything else, the entire political analysis megacomplex, it's all stagecraft, empty theater. On his podcast, Simmons called Roger Goodell a "liar," but many believe the real reason he was suspended was because of his dare afterward: "I really hope somebody calls me or emails me and says I'm in trouble for anything I say about Roger Goodell, because if one person says that to me, I'm going public. The commissioner's a liar and I get to talk about that on my podcast ... What Simmons said about Goodell isn't different than what other ESPN employees have said about Goodell, namely Keith Olbermann (though he was a bit more eloquent about it). There was once a wall between editorial and business at every publication in the country. When you criticize a business interest of your controlling company, you do so knowing full well what you are doing. What mattered was not necessarily that Simmons had called Goodell a liar: What mattered was that Simmons knew this was a sore spot, a stress point, for the network. That's all ephemeral -- soft, unquantifiable media.
Everyone's calling Roger Goodell a liar these days. It's why Simmons felt compelled to put his dare at the end of Goodell criticism. None of that compares to a call from the NFL's Park Avenue headquarters. Simmons, for all the good he has done, remains an unlikely martyr for corporate interference on press freedom.
He knew the business people would be angry with him. This is yet another chapter in an ongoing Simmons-vs.-his-bosses drama that has gone on for more than a decade now.
That's what gave his criticism extra bite in the first place. Simmons began his ESPN career as an insurgent -- remember, he was first noticed by Page 2 editors because of a running diary he wrote making fun of the ESPYs -- and he has worked hard to fortify that reputation even as he has become more entrenched within the company.
Because it doesn't really matter what any of these people say on television, what Simmons says, what Stephen A. They're just window dressing, time filler until actual sports come on. I'm just bummed that it came now when he would be gearing up for the NBA season.
And I wonder what it would look like now without it.